Efisiensi Teknis Usahatani Tebu Rakyat (TR) Kategori Tanaman Plant Cane (PC) Pada Lahan Tegal di Kabupaten Malang, Provinsi Jawa Timur
Abstract
The objectives of this study were: (1) Analyse the technical efficiency (TE) of smallholder sugarcane farming (TR); (2) Analyse the factors that affect TE; and (3) Analyse the profitability of farming using the Sistem Bagi Hasil (SBH) and Sistem Pembelian Tebu (SPT) partnership schemes. This study was conducted in the PG-PG Malang working area with 31 smallholder sugarcane farmers surveyed in the 2022-2023 planting season. The method of measuring technical efficiency uses DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis), tobit regression, and analysis of sugarcane farming in each partnership scheme (SBH and SPT). The results of the analysis showed that the average TE value of TR farming on land was 97% and still had the potential to be increased by 3%. Factors that influence the level of TE are educational variables, family dependents and the role of financial institutions. If the average productivity of TR is 1,308 tonnes/ha, yield 5.11%, sugar price Rp.13,200/kg and sugarcane price Rp.72,000/kg. Then the actual and target average income and RC ratio values obtained in the SBH partnership are respectively Rp.18.17 million/ha (1.26) and Rp.20.41 million/ha (1.30), while in the SPT partnership respectively Rp.18.27 million/ha (1.23) and Rp.20.50 million/ha (1.26). Based on the RC ratio value, the recommended partnership scheme is SBH. However, fluctuations in sugarcane prices need to be considered, for example at the end of the milling season the price can reach Rp.95,000-Rp.100,000 per quintal and it is ensured that the income earned in the SBH scheme is higher than the RC ratio.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amemiya, T. (1984). Tobit models: A survey. Journal of Econometrics, 24(1–2), 3–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(84)90074-5
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
Davis, H. S. (2018). the Measurement of Productive Efficiency. The Industrial Study of Economic Progress, 120(3), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv5rdxd5.7
Fahriyah, F., Hanani, N., Koestiono, D., & Syafrial, S. (2018). Analisis Efisiensi Teknis Usahatani Tebu Lahan Sawah dan Lahan Kering dengan Pendekatan Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 2(1), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jepa.2018.002.01.8
Fatimah, S., & Umi, M. (2017). Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA): Pengukuran Efisiensi Kinerja Sekolah Dasar. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 2, 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3381
Hartatie, D., Harlianingtyas, I., & Supriyadi, F. (2020). Pengaruh Curah Hujan dan Pemupukan terhadap Rendemen Tebu di PG Asembagus Situbondo. 47–54. https://doi.org/10.25047/agropross.2020.35
KADARWATI, F. T., SANTOSO, B., & KHULUQ, A. D. (2016). Improvement of Cane Yield and Sugar Yield of Sugarcane (Sacharrum officinarum) Through Maintaining Ratoon. In Jurnal Penelitian Tanaman Industri (Vol. 21, Issue 4, p. 199). https://doi.org/10.21082/littri.v21n4.2015.199-205
Kanti Dwi Cahyani, W., Marimin, M., & Sukardi, S. (2017). Model Produktivitas Bagi Hasil Agroindustri Gula Tebu Dalam Kemitraan Antara Petani Dan Perusahaan: Studi Kasus Di Pg Kremboong, Sidoarjo. Jurnal Teknologi Industri Pertanian, 27(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.24961/j.tek.ind.pert.2017.27.2.114
Nur M, Z., Ali, K., & Nun Maulida Suci, A. (2024). EFISIENSI TEKNIS USAHATANI PADI SAWAH PADA PERTANIAN PERKOTAAN DI KOTA SEMARANG : PENDEKATAN STOCHASTIC FRONTIER. 25(1), 89–97.
Nurhidayati, N., Abdul, B., & Sunawan, S. (2013). Hasil Tebu Pertama dan Keprasan serta Efisiensi Penggunaan Hara N dan S akibat Subtitusi Amonium Sulfat. 41(1), 54–61.
Pawirosemadi, M. (2011). Dasar-Dasar Teknologi Budidaya Tebu dan Pengolahan Hasilnya. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Permadhi, D., & Dianpratiwi, T. (2021). Efisiensi Usahatani Tebu Rakyat Lahan Sawah Kategori Tanaman PC (Plant Cane) (Studi Kasus: Wilayah Kerja PG Gempolkrep, PTPN X). Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 5(2), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jepa.2021.005.02.08
Presiden RI. (2023). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2023 Tentang Percepatan Swasembada Gula Nasional dan Penyediaan Bioetanol Sebagai Bahan Bakar Nabati (Biofuel). Presiden Republik Indonesia, 167440, 1–14.
Singarimbun. (2008). Metode Penelitian Survei. LP3ES.
Soediono, J., Virgantari, F., & Rahmawati, H. (2005). Perbandingan Model Tobit Dan Model Kuadrat Terkecil Untuk Data Tersensor. Forum Statistika Dan Komputasi, 10(1), 22–27.
Tejada, J. J., Raymond, J., & Punzalan, B. (2012). On the Misuse of Slovin’s Formula. The Philippine Statistician, 61(1), 8.
Yusvianto, A. G., & Kuntadi, E. B. (2022). Persepsi Petani Tebu Terhadap Penerapan Sistem Pembelian Tebu (Spt): Studi Kasus Di Kabupaten Situbondo. JSEP (Journal of Social and Agricultural Economics), 15(2), 229. https://doi.org/10.19184/jsep.v15i2.30397
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54256/isrj.v4i2.132
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Danang Permadhi, Sahrul Dwi Riyadi, Nuhfil Hanani, Fahriyah Fahriyah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Editorial Office:
Pusat Penelitian Perkebunan Gula Indonesia
Jl.Pahlawan Nomor 25 Pasuruan 67126, Indonesia
Telp:+62 0343 421086 ; Fax: +62 0343 421178
Email: p3gipasuruanok@gmail.com; web perusahaan:http://www.p3gi.co.id
Indonesian Sugar Research Journal (ISRJ) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.